A look at the Overland Train

The Overland Train is a tale of transportation innovation.

One improvement of the Overland Train Mk. II over the Mk. I was that the wheels of the cars behind the control car were programmed to turn at the same spot as the command car originally did, allowing for accurate movement of a long string of cars. Note that the Mk. II control car had six wheels, in contrast to the four wheels of the Mk. 1, and it retained the power crane at the rear of the car. Instead of the add-on frame for the radar unit of the Mk. 1, the Mk. II had the radar unit attached to external braces on the roof of the cab. David Doyle

In the early 20th century, Robert Gilmour LeTourneau established his company in California, initially building earthmoving equipment for his own contracting business. The equipment soon garnered the attention of others in the earthmoving business, leading LeTourneau to begin marketing the equipment he designed. The company quickly became known for three distinctive characteristics: innovation, massive scale, and the use of electric drive systems in its machinery.

The birth of the “land train” concept began in February 1953 with the Tournatrain— an articulated vehicle consisting of four units with 16 powered wheels, capable of carrying 60 tons. Within a year, LeTourneau expanded this design to include 8 units, 32 driven wheels, and doubled its capacity to 140 tons, powered by a 1000-horsepower engine. This caught the attention of the Army’s Transportation Research and Development Command, who were seeking vehicles capable of moving heavy loads across snow-covered terrain.

The first commercial application came from Alaska Freight Lines, who ordered a specialized version called the VC-22 Sno-Freighter for delivering components to the Distant Early Warning (DEW) line. This massive machine featured 24 electrically driven wheels, powered by twin Cummins V-12 diesel-driven generators, and could carry 150 tons of cargo across six units. However, the $450,000 vehicle’s career was brief; after just two successful trips, it suffered a catastrophic accident while descending a steep grade, followed by an engine fire. The abandoned vehicle remained in the Yukon for five years.

Despite this setback, the Army saw potential in the concept and in 1955 contracted LeTourneau to build the Logistical Cargo Carrier (LCC-1), designated by the company as model YS-1. This 173-foot-long behemoth consisted of a power unit pulling three trailers, each capable of carrying 15 tons. Power came from a Cummins VT-12 diesel engine-generator, which supplied electricity to motors in each of its 16 10-foot diameter tires — special units originally developed for an earlier project called the TC-264 Sno-Buggy.

One improvement of the Overland Train Mk. II over the Mk. I was that the wheels of the cars behind the control car were programmed to turn at the same spot as the command car originally did, allowing for accurate movement of a long string of cars. Note that the Mk. II control car had six wheels, in contrast to the four wheels of the Mk. 1, and it retained the power crane at the rear of the car. Instead of the add-on frame for the radar unit of the Mk. 1, the Mk. II had the radar unit attached to external braces on the roof of the cab. David Doyle

Technical Innovation

The vehicle’s maintenance was carefully considered in its design. A powered crane mounted at the rear of the control car facilitated the challenging task of changing the massive Firestone 48x68 tires. These weren’t ordinary tires - they were specially designed by LeTourneau and custom-molded by Firestone to meet the unique demands of Arctic operation.

Testing and Modifications

The LCC-1 underwent extensive testing — first in Texas, then Michigan, followed by 2,000 miles of service testing in Greenland, and finally in Alaska. These tests were key to refining not only the design, but the entire concept of an overland train.

• Early tests showed the vehicle’s remarkable ability to traverse snow with minimal ground pressure, despite its massive size

• The Army later added features including a snow deflector and a steel frame for mounting radar navigation equipment

• A significant upgrade came with the addition of a power car at the train’s rear, which provided additional electrical capacity for the wheel motors

• The vehicle proved its worth during Exercise Willow Freeze in 1961, successfully crossing a specially constructed ice bridge over the Gulkana River in Alaska

The tests proved successful enough that the Army proceeded with its ultimate goal: the TC-497 Overland Train Mark II.

While the Alaska Freight Lines VC-22 Sno-Freighter’s operational life was brief, it proved instrumental in developing future land trains. After its accident in fall 1956, it remained abandoned until the Army recovered it for Alaska Freight Lines five years later. Today, parts of this pioneering vehicle are preserved in Fox, Alaska, serving as a testament to early Arctic transportation innovation. David Doyle

The Mark II: Evolution of the Concept

The TC-497 was truly extraordinary. At 572 feet long — officially recorded as the longest land vehicle ever built — it weighed 300 tons empty and 450 tons fully loaded. Designated the Overland Train Mark II, the TC-497 represented a complete rethinking of the land train concept. Its control car featured panoramic windows and a more streamlined design, with the cab set behind the front wheels. The most significant advancement was its propulsion system; instead of diesel engines, it employed four Solar 10MC gas turbine engines, each producing 1,170 hp, to generate electricity for the 54 wheel-mounted traction motors.

The control cab included living quarters for six crew members, complete with sleeping areas, toilet facilities, and a galley. It even featured radar equipment for navigation. Each cargo car could transport 15 tons, giving a fully configured train with ten cargo cars a total capacity of 150 tons. The vehicle could maintain approximately 20 miles per hour on level ground - a remarkable achievement given its size and the terrain it was designed to traverse.

The TC-497 Overland Train Mark II represented a complete redesign of the concept. Photos from the LeTourneau test grounds in Longview, Texas, showcase its modernized control car design, featuring all-around windshields and a more streamlined profile compared to its predecessor. The front of the cab was set back behind the front wheels. Inside, it had living facilities for a six-man crew, including berthing, toilet, and a galley. Standing over 30 feet tall, the control car was no longer articulated, thanks to its advanced all-wheel steering system. David Doyle
Each cargo car could carry 15 tons, enabling a fully configured train with 10 cargo cars to transport 150 tons at speeds around 20 mph on level terrain. While testing at Yuma Proving Ground proved successful, changing military priorities and budgetary constraints prevented the vehicle from entering full production. David Doyle
The LCC-1 is shown here towing the usual three cargo trailers, but with a power car added to the end of the train. This supplied extra electricity to power the train’s wheels. There is evidence that the power car was used with the LCC-1 during exercises in Greenland in 1959. David Doyle

Completed in February 1962, the TC-497 was tested at the Desert Proving Ground in Yuma, Arizona. Despite its Arctic-oriented design, desert testing was crucial as the vehicle was intended for multiple climate conditions. Despite successful testing at Yuma Proving Ground, the project ultimately fell victim to changing military priorities and budgetary constraints as the Vietnam War demanded increasing resources. Accordingly, Arctic testing never occurred, and the TC-497 remained in Yuma. In 1971, it was sold at auction, with only the power car surviving today at the Yuma Proving Ground Heritage Center - the last remnant of this ambitious transportation project.

The Overland Train project represented a unique chapter in transportation history, pushing the boundaries of what was possible in overland cargo movement across extreme terrain. This comprehensive testing and development program, while ultimately not entering full production, demonstrated significant technological achievements in electric drive systems, Arctic mobility, and large-scale vehicular design that would influence future transportation projects. 

During vehicular tests, a photographer on a pickup truck bed photographs the LeTourneau Model YS-1 Army Sno-Train, the company’s name for the LCC-1 before the U.S. Army acquired it. The firm and its owner, Robert G. LeTourneau, worked closely with the U.S. Army Transportation Command to develop a vehicle capable to traversing tundra and arctic conditions with heavy loads. A workman’s head is visible in the clear Plexiglas dome on top of the cab. David Doyle
The LCC-1 (also known as the Overland Train Mark I) represented a significant advancement in Arctic logistics during the mid-1950s. Its primary mission was to support the Defense Early Warning (DEW) Line construction and operation in northern Canada by delivering supplies to remote bases far from conventional road networks. The vehicle’s design was remarkably sophisticated— its control vehicle contained two connected sections: a heated front compartment for three crew members and a rear section housing a 600-hp Cummins VF-12 Diesel engine with an integrated generator and fuel storage. David Doyle
When the LCC-1 was ready for military service, it received a fresh paint scheme including the U.S. Army Transportation Corps’ distinctive insignia on its front. Early photos show the vehicle at dockside, configured with just two of its three trailer units, as it awaited transport to its testing grounds. The Army had by this point added several modifications, including a protective deflector beneath the cab and framework for the radar navigation system. In this photo, the base assembly of the radar is installed, but the antenna is in storage. A workman is visible inside the door to the engine/generator compartment. David Doyle
Changing the huge tires of the LCC-1 was made easier with the powered crane mounted at the rear of the control car. In this photo dated Feb. 8, 1960, the crew mounts no-tread tires on a cargo trailer. The treaded tires visible on the engine/generator compartment of the control car were Firestone 48x68s. The tires were designed by LeTourneau, and molded to their specifications by Firestone. David Doyle
Early testing revealed one of the LCC-1’s most impressive features — its remarkably low ground pressure. Despite its massive size, the vehicle’s huge tires leave surprisingly light impressions in snow, even while nearby soldiers sank knee-deep in the same conditions. The vehicle’s wheels were equipped with special traction aids, attached via small hooks welded to the rims — a clever solution to improving grip without compromising the tire’s basic design. David Doyle

Love Heavy Haulers? Check out these articles!

Send your photos today

David Doyle's earliest published works were occasional articles in enthusiast publications aimed at the historic military vehicle restoration hobby. This was a natural outlet for a guy whose collection includes several Vietnam-era vehicles such as M62, M123A1C, M35A2, M36A2C, M292A2, M756, and an M764.

By 1999, his writing efforts grew to include regular features in leading periodicals devoted to the hobby both domestically and internationally, appearing regularly in US, English and Polish publications.

In 2003, David received his a commission to write his first book, The Standard Catalog of U.S. Military Vehicles. Since then, several outlets have published more than 100 of his works. While most of these concern historic military hardware, including aircraft and warships, his volumes on military vehicles, meticulously researched by David and his wife Denise, remain the genre for which he is most recognized. This recognition earned life-time achievement in June 2015, when he was presented Military Vehicle Preservation Association (MVPA) bestowed on him the coveted Bart Vanderveen Award in recognition of “...the individual who has contributed the most to the historic preservation of military vehicles worldwide.”

In addition to all of publishing efforts, David is the editor of the MVPA’s magazine, History in Motion, as well as serving as the organization’s Publications Director. He also maintains a retail outlet for his books online and at shows around the U.S.